Your Code Is Good, But AI's Getting Better: A Wake-up Call
From writing tests to commanding AI minions - a practical guide to staying ahead in 2025
Last Saturday, I had a thought-provoking conversation with a fellow Tech Lead. Despite being at the top of his game, he expressed genuine concern about his future career path and ability to provide for his family. His worries struck a chord with me - if someone at his level is thinking about upskilling, perhaps we all should be.
In the next 5 minutes, you'll discover:
What modern AI coding agents can actually do today
Where the demand for programmers is likely headed
3 career paths you can explore (or combine!) to stay ahead
The Reality of AI Code Agents in 2025
The landscape of AI coding assistants has evolved dramatically. Before we look at the key players, let's understand what's actually possible today:
Current Capabilities
✅ Advanced Autocompletion: Far beyond traditional suggestions - now includes whole function predictions
✅ Documentation Generation: Automated, context-aware documentation
✅ Small-Scale Problem Solving: Finding solutions within code snippets is largely solved
✅ Pull Request Management: Automated summaries and code review assistance
🟨 Whole Project Understanding: Getting there - tools like Devin and Cursor are showing promising results
🟨 Complex System Design: Still requires human expertise, but AI can assist with implementation
⚠️ Complete Automation: Despite the hype, AI isn't replacing developers - it's augmenting their capabilities (for now)
For those proficient with these tools, they significantly streamline development work. It would be almost wasteful not to leverage this technology.
Key Players in the Space
GitHub Copilot - The Pioneer
Microsoft's AI pair programmer has set the standard for code completion and suggestion. It's deeply integrated into the development workflow and continues to improve with each update.
Devin AI - The "Software Engineer" Assistant
Developed by Cognition Labs, Devin can autonomously plan, code, debug, and deploy software. Its unique feature? The ability to create detailed plans and delegate to "minion" agents for complex projects.
Cursor - Your IDE Companion
🚀 This is my go-to solution these days. I use it both for coding and as a research, writing, and thinking partner—working across multiple Markdown (.md) files and switching models based on my needs works surprisingly well.
Think Visual Studio Code but supercharged with AI. It works right in your development environment, offering real-time feedback and rapid iterations. Many developers prefer its seamless integration for day-to-day tasks.
Amazon CodeWhisperer - The Enterprise Choice
Amazon's entry into the AI coding space focuses on:
Enterprise-grade security
Multi-language support
Specialized support for data analysts
Deep AWS integration
We're witnessing an intense race among genAI models to achieve better code generation capabilities. Recent benchmarks show significant improvements in areas like competitive programming tasks and real-world GitHub issue resolution.
Here’s a link you can use to check current leaderboards across most popular benchmarks:
https://paperswithcode.com/task/code-generation
The Future Market for Programmers
Let's be honest - making predictions about the future is impossible. Each of us has to make our own bet and invest (or not) time into upskilling based on that decision.
Here's what I'm fairly confident about:
Landing that first job as an "old school programmer" will become increasingly challenging
Job transitions will get tougher - smaller market, bigger competition pool
What once required a full team might soon be accomplished by a fraction of the workforce (Yes, I know new positions will open up, but I'm focusing specifically on current developers here)
There are two extreme views in the "AI impact on developers" debate:
"AI will replace coding entirely - we'll just describe apps in prompts"
"AI is just hype - I tried Copilot and it sucks"
For the first view - maybe you're right. But isn't it better to maximize our potential with current valuable skills than wait for the apocalypse? For the second view - I can only smile and walk away. These folks will find every excuse not to embrace new technology - ironically, while working in tech themselves.
FYI: I don't put much stock in big tech CEOs' announcements - they often have their own agendas. Such claims (check the short below) seems a bit too optimistic, at least for now ;)
3 Paths to Consider (Mix & Match Encouraged!)
These paths aren't mutually exclusive - think of them as guideposts for potential career development. They're ranked from most essential to most specialized, with Path 1 being practically mandatory for modern developers.
Path 1 - Fluent AI Programmer (The Must-Have)
This path is becoming essential for any programmer. Whether you're a junior developer looking to accelerate your learning or a senior engineer aiming to multiply your productivity, this skill set is becoming as fundamental as version control.
There are two main approaches:
The Pair Programming Buddy Approach
Use AI as your collaborative partner
Write your code, feed detailed prompts
Let AI help with brainstorming and boilerplate code
Develop your own "prompt library" over time
Focus on code review and validation
Use AI for documentation and test generation
The Army of Minions Approach
Orchestrate multiple AI agents for larger features
Focus on managing, monitoring, and fine-tuning output
More experimental now, but showing promise in startups and MVPs
Requires strong system design knowledge
Learn to delegate tasks between different AI Agents, tune them to your needs and experiment.
Key Activities:
Master prompt engineering for better AI output - or in other words sharper your communication skills ;)
Learn the strengths and limitations of different AI coding tools
Build a workflow that combines multiple AI assistants
Always validate and test AI-generated code
Stay updated with new AI coding tools and features
Perfect for:
Junior developers wanting to accelerate their learning curve
Senior developers looking to multiply their productivity
Anyone working on projects with tight deadlines
Developers who want to focus more on architecture and less on boilerplate
🎁 If you don’t now who to follow on linkedin with “army of minions” apporach rUv is experimenting a lot with them: https://www.linkedin.com/in/reuvencohen/
Path 2 - AI Integrator
The LLM hype is real, but businesses are approaching it cautiously. They're thinking about:
AI performance reliability
Process definition
Business impact potential
Data privacy and security
Integration with existing systems
Good news: Despite the LLM hype, there aren't many developers who know how to build systems around them. Even fewer have commercial implementation experience. And here's the kicker - it doesn't require heavy math or ML skills!
Pros:
No need for deep AI knowledge
Growing demand as open-source models improve
Close connection to business (a pro for some!)
Opportunity to shape AI adoption in organizations
Work with cutting-edge technology while staying practical
Cons:
Field changes faster than frontend development
Some skills may become obsolete as genAI evolves
Measuring success can be subjective and challenging
Requires constant learning and adaptation
Need to balance technical and business requirements
Things to learn:
python 🐍
prompt engineering
frameworks / libs: LangChain, LangGraph, CrewAI, LLamaIndex, smolagents
RAG, AI Agency
genAI limitations 💡
Who to follow? LangChain and CrewAI both put a lot of effort to show best practices and whats currently possible.
Path 3 - LLM Ninja
This is the most specialized path, betting that the market will need specialized LLMs for specific tasks. It's different from Path 2 because you focus solely on LLMs rather than building systems around them. In practice some projects will require people from both of this world.
Perfect for:
ML engineers wanting to specialize in LLMs
Developers fascinated by the cutting edge of AI
Those willing to invest time in deep technical expertise
Engineers who enjoy optimization challenges
Key Focus Areas:
Understanding model architectures
Fine-tuning and optimization techniques
Data privacy and security considerations
Performance benchmarking and evaluation
Keeping up with latest research and developments
Why consider it? Businesses don't want to send sensitive data to OpenAI, Google, or Anthropic. They need similar performance but with data privacy. Enter LLM ninjas who know which open-source models to use and how to optimize them.
Pros:
High demand for specialized skills
Close to cutting-edge AI development
Rewarding work teaching models new tricks
Cons:
Could become less relevant as genAI progresses
Requires strong mathematical background to really understand what and why you’re doing
Takes time to build expertise
Business awareness still crucial
Things to learn:
There’s a lot to learn. I’d start with NLP course from huggingface + some additional materials for things you do not understand. Also read Philipp Schmid blog and thank me later - https://www.philschmid.de
Final Thoughts
The future of programming isn't about choosing one path - it's about finding your unique combination. Path 1 (Fluent AI Programmer) is becoming essential for everyone, while Paths 2 and 3 offer interesting pivot opportunities if you're concerned about long-term career prospects.
Remember: The goal isn't to predict the future perfectly but to stay adaptable and keep learning. Choose what resonates with you, experiment, and don't be afraid to adjust your course as the technology landscape evolves.
Stay curious, stay learning! 📚✨
Really appreciate this balanced and practical take on AI's impact on programming careers! Your point about there being two extreme views - "AI will replace everything" vs "AI is just hype" - really resonates with my experience working with dev teams. The truth, as usual, lies somewhere in the middle.
I've been experimenting a lot with AI tools in my projects, and what I've noticed matches your Path 1 description perfectly - it's becoming less about whether to use AI and more about HOW to use it effectively. The "Army of Minions" approach you described is particularly interesting... I've seen teams struggle with delegation to human team members, and now we're adding AI agents to the mix! It's both exciting and challenging.
One thing I'd add to your excellent analysis: the human skills - like understanding business context, breaking down complex problems, and effective communication - are becoming even MORE important as AI handles more of the routine coding. In my experiments with AI coding assistants, the quality of output is directly proportional to how well you can articulate the problem and constraints.
Love the practical, no-nonsense approach of this article. It's not about predicting the future perfectly (impossible!) but about staying adaptable and finding our own path forward. Keep these thoughtful analyses coming!
P.S. The bit about "making predictions is impossible" made me smile... as someone who's made plenty of wrong predictions about tech trends, I totally relate to that humility!